The Official Blog of the

Archive for the ‘Track II’ Category

Reestablishing a Europe-wide Security Zone

In Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Europe, NGOs, Solidarity, The former Soviet Union, The Search for Peace, Track II, UKRAINE, United Nations on June 23, 2024 at 7:00 AM

By René Wadlow

On June 15, 2024, Russian Federation Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated that “Russia will not view Western European countries as possible partners for at least one generation. The acute phase of the military-political confrontation with the West continues and is in full swing.” He was echoed in an interview by Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov who said that NATO is “a group in which we feel not an ounce of trust, which triggers political and even emotional rejection in Moscow.”

It is likely that the two Sergeys express a view held by many governmental decision-makers in Moscow. Where they are wrong is that the world cannot wait for one generation to reestablish a Europe-wide security zone but most start now. Given current governmental preoccupations, it is likely that nongovernmental organizations must take the lead.

In the 1960s, the idea of a European security conference was launched by the USSR followed in 1966 by a proposal of the Warsaw Pact Organization. After a good deal of discussion and some modifications of policies, especially the West German Ostpolitik, it was decided to convene a Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe. At the invitation of the Finnish government, multilateral preparatory talks began near Helsinki in November 1972. There were numerous preparatory aspects, especially the subjects of such a conference.

The admission card to the Conference for Security and Cooperation Meeting in Helsinki for Erich Honecker, the hardline Communist ruler of East Germany from 1971 to 1989
(C) Wikimedia Commons-HajjiBaba

Thus, the main issues of the conference were transferred for negotiation to Geneva, Switzerland to be undertaken by experts. During this period of negotiations in Geneva, nongovernmental organization (NGO) representatives in Geneva who were known for their activities at the United Nations (UN) were able to present proposals for possible consideration. The Association of World Citizens (AWC) was particularly active in presenting ideas on the resolution of conflicts and the possible use of arbitration as an appropriate means of dispute settlement. The Helsinki process later created an arbitration body in Geneva, but it is little used. The Association was also active with other NGOs in what was called the “human dimension” of the Helsinki agreement. The conference had deliberately not used a human rights vocabulary. The extensive participation of nongovernmental representatives is recognized in the text of the Final Act and encouraged to continue. The results of the Geneva negotiations led to the signature of the Final Act in Helsinki on August 1, 1975.

Today, it is likely that the Russia-Ukraine conflict starting with the 2014 annexation of Crimea has ended the effectiveness of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). Thus, in many ways, we are “back to square one” in the organization of a Europe-wide security zone with many more States to be involved due to the breakup of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia. There is also the issue of what has been called “The Phantom Republics”: Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia, Transnistria in Moldova, Kosovo, formerly part of Serbia, and the disputed Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics in Ukraine. These are “ministates” economically fragile, potentially manipulated by more powerful States but which will not be reintegrated into their former State even if granted significant autonomy.

There is a rich heritage of efforts made within the OSCE. However, the OSCE has also very real limitations. It has a tight budget and a lack of specialized personnel. Much of the staff are diplomats seconded from national governments. This results in a high turnover of staff and a lack of primary loyalty to the organization. Nevertheless, the OSCE has been able to respond to situations which were not foreseen at its creation. Much of the future depends on the attitude of the Russian Federation which at present seems negative. New avenues are likely to be needed, and NGOs may again be able to play positive roles.

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

Sudan Conflict Grows Worse as UN Security Council Appeals Fall on Deaf Ears

In Africa, Being a World Citizen, Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, Middle East & North Africa, NGOs, Refugees, Spirituality, Sudan, The Search for Peace, Track II, United Nations, War Crimes on June 17, 2024 at 6:00 AM

By René Wadlow

On June 13, 2024, the United Nations (UN) Security Council called for an end to the siege on El Fasher, the capital of the North Darfur Province of Sudan. The Council requested all parties to enable lifesaving aid to enter the city of El Fasher, the center of the most vicious fighting. The brutality of the fighting makes it impossible for aid workers to enter the city.

The civil war has gone on since April 2023 between the Rapid Support Forces led by General Mohamed Hamdan, known by his battle name of Hemedti, and the Sudanese Armed Forces led by General Abdul Fattah al-Burham. The fighting has led to some 15,000 persons being killed and 8 million displaced. The agriculture in the country is disorganized, and many people face acute hunger and, in some areas, famine.

Each of the two generals has created local militias which rob, torture, rape, and create conditions of disorder. Many of the militias use child soldiers in violation of UN treaties on the protection of children. Each of the two generals has opened the door to foreign fighters. There are Russian mercenaries which had been under the control of the Russian Wagner Group who had been fighting in Mali, Chad, Niger, and the Central African Republic. There are Ukrainian mercenaries who have come to fight the Russians.

It is difficult to understand the intensity of the current divisions represented by the two generals who had once been allies. The current divisions do not follow earlier fault lines in Sudan.

(C) Cable News Network

On behalf of the Association of World Citizens (AWC), I had been the first to raise in the UN Commission on Human Rights in 2004 the violent conditions in Darfur, Sudan, having been informed by a member of the UN Secretariat who was leaving the country and who could not speak out for himself. The violent conditions in Darfur were largely based on ethnic divisions linked to lifestyle differences between settled agriculturalists and cattle herders. There were also aspects of political divisions at the national level.

We kept in close contact with the Sudanese Mission to the UN in Geneva. Thus, the AWC was invited to be observers in the referendum which led to the creation of the State of South Sudan. The World Citizens had sent a team of observers.

Today, the suffering is real. Enlightened action is necessary. The conflictual situation requires close cooperation among humanitarian and peace nongovernmental organizations to see what is possible.

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

For a historic background on Darfur, see Julie Flint and Alex de Wall, Darfur: A Short History of a Long War (London: Zed Books, 2005).

Increased Israeli-Lebanese Tensions: Conflict Resolution Measures Urgently Needed

In Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Middle East & North Africa, NGOs, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, Track II, United Nations on June 9, 2024 at 11:00 AM

By René Wadlow

On June 6, 2024, United Nations (U.N.) Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for an urgent ceasefire in the armed conflict on the Lebanese frontier between the armed forces of Israel and the armed militia within Lebanon of Hezbollah. Clashes between Hezbollah and the Israeli military along the Israel-Lebanon border have recently increased in scope in terms of both the territory under fire and the weapons used. Already 100,000 Israelis and an equal number of Lebanese have been forced to flee their home. UNIFIL – the U.N. peacekeeping forces in southern Lebanon – has not been able to prevent this escalation.

The Nongovernmental Organization (NGO) Human Rights Watch, in a new report called Lebanon: Israel’s White Phosphorous Use Risks Civilian Harm, stated that white phosphorous, which poses a high risk of burns and long suffering, was used by Israeli forces in at least 17 towns in southern Lebanon since October 2023. Amnesty International has also documented the use of white phosphorous in southern Lebanon. In addition, Lebanon’s Ministry of Public Health says that the white phosphorous attacks have caused hundreds of forest fires in Lebanon.

An end to the armed conflict in the Gaza Strip remains the key to ending the hostilities between Hezbollah and the Israeli military. Hezbollah has stated that a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip is a precondition for stopping its attacks. Currently, there are discussions among Egyptian, Qatari, and U.S. mediators on a ceasefire with phases. The U.S. proposals were set out by U.S. President Biden on May 31, 2024, but progress is very uncertain.

(C) Daily Star Lebanon

A Gaza Strip ceasefire, while necessary, is only a first step in the process needed of negotiations in good faith among Israelis and Palestinians. On October 8, 2023, in light of the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israeli settlements, the Association of World Citizens (AWC) had stated,

“As Citizens of the World, we call for a ceasefire in the Israeli-Palestinian armed conflict:

– for the release of all hostages held by Hamas and other Palestinian groups;

– for the release of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails, often under administrative detention without trial;

– for preventing the extension of the conflict to the frontier of Lebanon through negotiations with Hezbollah;

– for preventing an increase in violence on the West Bank among Israeli settlers and Palestinian villages;

– for the start of negotiations in good faith for a political solution that ensures freedom and the collective safety of Israelis and Palestinians.”

The AWC believes that these proposals can build on a pool of shared values, create a climate of dialogue and trust, and set the stage for a new political reality.

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

International Criminal Court: Upholding International Humanitarian Law

In Being a World Citizen, Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, International Justice, Middle East & North Africa, NGOs, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, Track II, War Crimes, World Law on May 21, 2024 at 6:00 AM

By René Wadlow

Karim Khan, chief prosecutor for the International Criminal Court (ICC), on May 20, 2024 announced that he had formally applied for arrest warrants for leaders of the Israeli government and the political and military leaders of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) for war crimes and crimes against humanity as set out in the Rome Statute which created the ICC. The Israeli leaders are Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) Chief of Staff, General Herzi Halevi. The Hamas leaders are Yahya Sinwar, head of Hamas since 2017, Mohammed Diab Ibrahim Al-Masri, the Commander-in-Chief of the Al-Assam Brigades – the military arm of Hamas, and Ismail Haniyeh, head of Hamas’s Political Bureau based in Doha, Qatar.

The Israelis are accused of violations of international humanitarian law including starvation as a method of war including the denial of humanitarian relief supplies and deliberately targeting civilians. The Hamas leaders are said to be individually criminally responsible for the killing of Israeli civilians on October 7, 2023 and the taking of hostages.

(C) International Criminal Court

Karim Khan stated in an interview at the time of the announcement of the arrest warrants, “We must collectively demonstrate that international humanitarian law, the foundational baseline for human conduct during conflict, applies to all individuals and applies equally across the situations addressed by my Office and the Court. This is how we will prove, tangibly, that the lives of all human beings have equal value.”

The application for arrest warrants is the first step. The warrants must be approved by a panel of ICC judges which oversee such decisions. Israel is not a party to the Rome Statute of the ICC, but Palestine accepted its jurisdiction in 2015. The legal aspect of the next steps is complicated and need to be followed closely.

The Association of World Citizens has stressed that all elements of international humanitarian law must be safeguarded and charges of war crimes investigated.

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

Start to Dangerous Regression of Liberty in Georgia: A Situation to Watch Closely

In Being a World Citizen, Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Democracy, Europe, Human Rights, NGOs, Solidarity, The former Soviet Union, Track II, World Law on May 16, 2024 at 7:00 PM

By René Wadlow

Despite strong protests from Georgian Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) and street protests for three weeks in the capital Tbilisi, the Georgian Parliament adopted on May 14, 2024 the controversial law on “foreign influence”. The vote was 84 in favor and 30 opposed. The law is likely to be vetoed by the Georgian President, Salomé Zourabichvili, a former French diplomat, but there are probably enough favorable votes in the Parliament to override the veto.

The law is very close to a similar law of 2012 in the Russian Federation used to hinder NGOs often considered to be “enemy agents” voicing opposition to the government. The law obliges NGOs and media to publish all financing from foreign governments, foundations, and individuals if it amounts to 20 or more percent of the funds of the organization. The law has been strongly opposed by officials of the European Union and the United States. Georgia has a candidate status for joining the European Union.

(C) Euronews

The former Prime Minister and leader of the Georgian Dream Party in power for the last 12 years, Bidzina Ivanichvili, has attacked those opposed to the law as “people without a country” – a term used in the Soviet Union in the 1930s. He has been playing with a fear among some in power in Georgia that NGOs with foreign funding could create a “color revolution” to overthrow the government as was done elsewhere.

In the days prior to the vote, there was strong government pressure against journalists and NGO representatives, some being beaten and many threatened by telephone calls. As Citizens of the World concerned with the role of NGOs and freedom of the press, we need to watch developments in Georgia closely.

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

Rafah, Gaza Strip: A Human Catastrophe in the Making

In Being a World Citizen, Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, Middle East & North Africa, NGOs, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, Track II, United Nations, World Law on May 9, 2024 at 5:00 PM

By René Wadlow

“I am disturbed and distressed by the renewed military activity in Rafah by the Israeli Defense Forces. Make no mistake – a full-scale assault on Rafah would be a human catastrophe,”

United Nations (UN) Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told reporters on May 7, 2024. The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs reported that more than 35,000 Palestinians have been killed in the Gaza Strip, some 78,000 have suffered injuries, and nearly 2 million have been internally displaced. The number is rising as the ground invasion of Rafah begins.

(C) UN Geneva on Instagram

The UN Human Rights Council Special Rapporteurs have painted a grim picture of the disproportionate level of suffering experienced by girls and especially pregnant women in Gaza. “The treatment of pregnant and lactating women continues to be appalling with the direct bombardment of hospitals and the deliberate denial of access to health care facilities by Israeli snipers, combined with the lack of beds and medical resources placing an estimated 50,000 pregnant Palestinian women and 20,000 newborn babies at unimaginable risk.”

Many of these military actions are in direct violation of International Humanitarian Law as set out in the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949 and the Protocol Additional adopted in 1977. In order to meet new situations, International Humanitarian Law (IHL) has evolved to cover not only international armed conflicts but also internal armed conflicts. IHL prohibits the indiscriminate killing of civilians, the holding of hostages, and the destruction of medical and educational infrastructure.

The Association of World Citizens stresses the importance of IHL as a vital part of world law that will replace unilateral actions by States based on narrow domestic political considerations. The standards of IHL require political will if they are to function effectively. Thus, nongovernmental action on the Gaza Strip armed conflict is urgently needed.

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

United Nations Human Rights Focus on Iran Continues

In Being a World Citizen, Current Events, Human Rights, Middle East & North Africa, NGOs, Solidarity, Track II, United Nations, World Law on April 6, 2024 at 6:00 AM

By René Wadlow

The United Nations (UN) Human Rights Council whose Spring session ended on April 5, 2024 voted on April 4 to continue the mandate of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Iran. The Mission is a three-person group, all women, chaired by Sara Hossain of Bangladesh. The Mission was created in 2022 in response to the death in police offices of Jina Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old woman of the Iranian-Kurdish community. The protests had begun in the Kurdish areas but quickly spread to many areas of the country and became known by their protest cry of “Woman, Life, Freedom”.

The Mission has collected material from many sources including reports and statements from Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) such as Amnesty International and the Association of World Citizens (AWC). The Mission is to continue for the year 2024 in order to complete and write up its findings.

The vote on the continuation of the Mission is a reflection of the political divisions of the 47-member Human Rights Council. 24 States voted for the continuation, 8 against and 15 abstained. Those States voting against were the Asian countries: China, Vietnam, Indonesia, the African: Algeria, Sudan, Burundi, Eritrea, and Cuba for Latin America. Abstaining were the Asian States: Bangladesh, India, Malaysia, Maldives, the African States: Cameroon, Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, South Africa, the Arab States: Kuwait, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, and the Central Asian: Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.

In addition to the vote on the continuation of the Fact-Finding Mission, there was a positive vote also on April 4 to continue the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran who is since July 2018 Mr. Javaid Rehman, Professor of Law at Brunel University in London. The position of a Special Rapporteur of the Human Rights Council, usually devoted to a specific country or to a topic such as food, education, or housing, has taken on a real importance. The Special Rapporteur, usually an academic who has had earlier contact with the UN human rights efforts, is not a member of the UN Secretariat and is not paid – the idea being that this increases his independence. His expenses are covered on the days on which he is working on his topic, and he has secretarial and clerical help from the UN Secretariat.

Each year Professor Rehman regrets that the Iranian government refuses his entry into the country, but like the Fact-Finding Mission, he carries out a large number of interviews with Iranians in exile, scholars, and the representatives of NGOs. He usually covers the same issues and makes recommendations. It is impossible to know how the recommendations are discussed by the Iranian authorities. However, in practice, there are few signs of progress.

(C) Taymaz Valley

Topics regularly analyzed are the use of the death penalty, arbitrary arrest, use of torture and degrading treatment, freedom of opinion and expression, arrests of human rights defenders and lawyers, sexual violence, discrimination against members of the Baha’i faith and other religious minorities, discrimination against ethnic minorities and the position of women and children. The analysis is followed by recommendations for meeting UN human rights standards. All on 42 pages this year.

The reports of the Special Rapporteurs are part of a process of awareness building. There are seldom obvious victories, but a central task of our time is to evolve a world order based on principles of peace and justice. A useful analysis of the role of Special Rapporteurs is a book by Alfred de Zayas, Building A Just World Order. (1) De Zayas had been for 16 years a member of the UN human rights Secretariat. On retirement, he became an academic in Geneva. For six years he was the Human Rights Council Independent Expert on the Promotion of a Democratic and Equitable International Order (2012-2018). We knew each other well when I was an NGO representative at the UN in Geneva and often worked on human rights issues.

Professor Rehman’s analysis of Iran is a good overview and serves as an agenda for NGO action.

Note

(1) Alfred de Zayas, Building A Just World Order (Atlanta, GA: Clarity Press, 2021, 466 pp.)

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

Burma: A Sad Anniversary

In Asia, Being a World Citizen, Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Democracy, Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, NGOs, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, Track II on February 1, 2024 at 8:00 AM

By René Wadlow

February 1 marks the anniversary of the military coup which overthrew the government of Aung San Suu Kyi in 2021. She was in practice the leader of the government but could not take the title of “President”. An earlier military junta had passed a law with her in mind saying that a person married to a foreigner could not become president. Aung San Suu Kyi had married a British anthropologist, Michael Aris, a specialist on Tibet who died in 1989 of cancer. Aung San Suu Kyi represented a new spirit – partly because she had lived most of her life outside Burma and was not linked to existing political compromises.

On February 14, 2021, a protest in Myanmar against the military coup (C) MgHla

Her father, Aung San, who died when Aung San Suu Kyi was two years old, was one of the original “Thirty Comrades” – student nationalists who were inspired by Second World War Japanese propaganda which appealed for a common Asian struggle against Western imperialism. Aung San went to Tokyo to assist the Japanese conquest of Burma. However, by 1944, the “Thirty Comrades” had decided that the Japanese were not liberators, that the occupation of Burma was carried out for Japanese rather than Burmese aims, and that the Japanese might lose the war. In the last year of the war, the “Thirty Comrades” cooperated with Lord Mountbatten.

Thus, on January 27, 1947, British Prime Minister Clement Attlee and Aung San signed an agreement for full independence of Burma within a year. On July 19, 1947, Aung San was assassinated by a political rival. He became a legend of Burmese independence.

Aung San Suu Kyi was educated in India (where her mother served as ambassador of Burma) and at Oxford University. She only returned to Burma in 1988 to take care of her dying mother. Her dynamism, combined with the legend of her father, led her to being named secretary of the National League for Democracy.

On June 14, 2012, Aung San Suu Kyi welcomed at the International Labor Organization’s premises in Geneva (C) Violaine Martin/UN Geneva

Since the military junta has taken power, it has intensified the struggle against the ethnic minorities – the Mon, Kachen, Karen, Shan, Wa, the Arakan Muslims, and others. The ethnic minorities represent some 40 percent of the population, the Burmese, some 60 percent. However, population statistics are not based on real population surveys. Decades of self-imposed isolation, fabricated statistics and an absence of social and economic research have left even the authorities without an accurate appreciation of the distribution of the population. The military have destroyed villages along the frontiers with China, India, Thailand, and Bangladesh.

While we are critical of the military government and their repressive policies, we must not idealize the forces of the ethnic insurgencies. In 1992-1993, I was involved in getting the National Council of the Union of Burma created by the insurgencies and democratic Burmese who had taken refuge in the ethnic minority zones to sign the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1947 and the protocols additional which provide the basic rules of international humanitarian law in armed conflict. The Union President, General Saw Bo Myn of the Karen National Union, and the three Vice Presidents signed in January 1993. While the signature is symbolic – only governments may sign the Geneva conventions – the signature was widely noted and led the Myanmar government to sign the conventions which they had always refused to do until then. The signature led to a mutual release of war prisoners – but not to a formal exchange as the two sides in the conflict refused direct contact at the time.

Burma, now renamed Myanmar after 1988, faces two basic and related issues: the installation of democratic government and a constitutional system which allows autonomy to the minority peoples. Both tasks are difficult. There is little democratic tradition or ethos upon which to structure a democratic government. While a federal or con-federal system would be the most suited for a multi-ethnic state, what leadership exists both in the junta and the insurgencies is motivated by personal and clan-centered interests. The leaders recruit allies similarly motivated. Only peace will allow new leadership to emerge with broader motivations and allow all citizens to participate in a renewed political process.

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

Israel-Palestine: Paths to Negotiations

In Being a World Citizen, Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, International Justice, Middle East & North Africa, NGOs, Nonviolence, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, Track II, United Nations, War Crimes, World Law on January 22, 2024 at 7:48 PM

By René Wadlow

With the armed conflict in the Gaza Strip continuing to increase the number of dead, wounded, and displaced and the danger of the conflict spreading to other areas of the Middle East, renewed efforts of conflict resolution need to be made. The United Nations (UN) has been active especially in relief efforts, and many Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) have expressed their concern. NGOs have also been active in relief efforts. However, the inadequate amount of relief supplies that enter the Gaza Strip limits the impact of nongovernmental activity.

From the start of the Gaza conflict more than 100 days ago, NGOs such as the Association of World Citizens have been highlighting positive steps on the path to negotiations. They have stressed four major steps:

1) An immediate ceasefire;

2) Release of hostages held by Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups, release of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails – often under administrative detention without trial;

3) Preventing the extension of the conflict to Lebanon’s frontier through negotiations with Hezbollah;

4) Preventing an increase in violence in the West Bank between Israeli settlers and Palestinian villages.

In October 2023, a building destroyed in Gaza (C) Ali Hamad/APAimages

The start of hearings on the charge of genocide at the International Court of Justice has added international attention to the Gaza Strip situation and more broadly to the Israel-Palestine drama.

The need for conflict resolution action is great. The proposals of NGOs hold a light of hope.

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

Preventing the Expansion of the Gaza Conflict: Are Peace Brigades a Possibility?

In Asia, Being a World Citizen, Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Middle East & North Africa, NGOs, Nonviolence, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, Track II, United Nations, United States, World Law on January 16, 2024 at 12:28 PM

By René Wadlow

Antony Blinken, the United States (U.S.) Secretary of State, has been again in the Middle East working to prevent the violence of the Gaza Strip of spreading to much of the area. The Gaza Strip conflict has already spread to the West Bank with increased violence between Jewish settlers and Palestinian inhabitants. There is increased violence along the frontier of Lebanon with the activities of the armed faction Hezbollah and the displacement of Israeli villages. Negotiations in good faith seem far off, and political speeches grow more conflictual. Could there be a role for unarmed, non-governmental peace brigades to monitor frontiers and lessen tensions?

One possibility, inspired by the efforts of Shanti Sena (Peace Army) developed by followers of Mahatma Gandhi in India to deal with Hindu-Muslim violence is to place some nongovernmental teams on the frontier between antagonists in order to provide an opportunity for all parties to “cool off” and negotiate.

(C) Exotic India

One such effort in which I was directly involved was an effort to place a peace team on the Nicaraguan-Honduras frontier in 1981. At the time, it was thought that the 400 strong U.S. troops stationed in Honduras might cross the frontier to attack the Sandinista-leftest government in Nicaragua or to help actively the anti-Sandinista Contras to do so. A group of persons associated with the Santa Cruz Resource Center for Nonviolence in California and affiliated to the organization Peace Brigades International were able to put a team together and move to the Nicaragua-Honduras frontier on short notice. The group called itself “The Jalapa Brigade” after the small Nicaraguan city near the Honduran frontier where it was posted.

When the Jalapa Brigade was being put into place, the Ambassador of Nicaragua to the United Nations (UN) in Geneva was a former student of mine, and his brother, also a former student of mine, was the legal advisor to the President of Nicaragua. In fact, when the team arrived, Daniel Ortega, the President, introduced the team as “Friends of Humanity.”

Through the Ambassador, I was able to inform all the Central American Missions to the UN as to the aims and role of the Peace Brigade. In the end, the U.S. military did not cross the frontier. Perhaps it never intended to do so. It may also have been that the interposition of U.S. citizens with good organizational contacts helped to weigh in the U.S. military decision-making process. When the team left, the leader of the Protestant “Evangelical Committee for Development Aid” said “The proof of your triumph lies in the fact that no attacks were made while you were in the Jalapa area.”

There have been other such interposition efforts. One was the Gulf Peace Team created at the time of the 1990 Iraqi annexation of Kuwait. The aim of the 73-member Peace Team was to be an “international multicultural team working for peace and opposing any form of armed aggression by setting up one or more international peace camps between the opposing armed forces. Our object will be to withstand nonviolently any armed aggression by any party to the present Gulf dispute.” However, on January 27, 1991, the peace camp was closed by Iraq because the authorities had “decided that the continued presence of the camp was a security risk.”

Likewise, a January 2022 proposal of the Association of World Citizens, “Ukraine-Donbass-Russian Frontier: Is a Nongovernmental Interposition Peace Team a Possibility?“, was followed three weeks later by the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Thus, the creation of interposition peace teams in the Israel-Palestine conflict would not be easy to create for political and logistic reasons. There are economic and logistic resources required and, more importantly, there is the need to raise enough volunteers who are mature, culturally sensitive, and analytically minded to achieve a critical mass that would make a difference in the decision-making of the conflicting parties. There is also the need to keep the unity of purpose within the teams if they have not worked together before. However, the current situation is very dangerous. The dangers are widely recognized. Therefore, all forms of conflict reduction need to be explored.

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.