The Official Blog of the

Archive for the ‘Solidarity’ Category

Preventing the Expansion of the Gaza Conflict: Are Peace Brigades a Possibility?

In Asia, Being a World Citizen, Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Middle East & North Africa, NGOs, Nonviolence, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, Track II, United Nations, United States, World Law on January 16, 2024 at 12:28 PM

By René Wadlow

Antony Blinken, the United States (U.S.) Secretary of State, has been again in the Middle East working to prevent the violence of the Gaza Strip of spreading to much of the area. The Gaza Strip conflict has already spread to the West Bank with increased violence between Jewish settlers and Palestinian inhabitants. There is increased violence along the frontier of Lebanon with the activities of the armed faction Hezbollah and the displacement of Israeli villages. Negotiations in good faith seem far off, and political speeches grow more conflictual. Could there be a role for unarmed, non-governmental peace brigades to monitor frontiers and lessen tensions?

One possibility, inspired by the efforts of Shanti Sena (Peace Army) developed by followers of Mahatma Gandhi in India to deal with Hindu-Muslim violence is to place some nongovernmental teams on the frontier between antagonists in order to provide an opportunity for all parties to “cool off” and negotiate.

(C) Exotic India

One such effort in which I was directly involved was an effort to place a peace team on the Nicaraguan-Honduras frontier in 1981. At the time, it was thought that the 400 strong U.S. troops stationed in Honduras might cross the frontier to attack the Sandinista-leftest government in Nicaragua or to help actively the anti-Sandinista Contras to do so. A group of persons associated with the Santa Cruz Resource Center for Nonviolence in California and affiliated to the organization Peace Brigades International were able to put a team together and move to the Nicaragua-Honduras frontier on short notice. The group called itself “The Jalapa Brigade” after the small Nicaraguan city near the Honduran frontier where it was posted.

When the Jalapa Brigade was being put into place, the Ambassador of Nicaragua to the United Nations (UN) in Geneva was a former student of mine, and his brother, also a former student of mine, was the legal advisor to the President of Nicaragua. In fact, when the team arrived, Daniel Ortega, the President, introduced the team as “Friends of Humanity.”

Through the Ambassador, I was able to inform all the Central American Missions to the UN as to the aims and role of the Peace Brigade. In the end, the U.S. military did not cross the frontier. Perhaps it never intended to do so. It may also have been that the interposition of U.S. citizens with good organizational contacts helped to weigh in the U.S. military decision-making process. When the team left, the leader of the Protestant “Evangelical Committee for Development Aid” said “The proof of your triumph lies in the fact that no attacks were made while you were in the Jalapa area.”

There have been other such interposition efforts. One was the Gulf Peace Team created at the time of the 1990 Iraqi annexation of Kuwait. The aim of the 73-member Peace Team was to be an “international multicultural team working for peace and opposing any form of armed aggression by setting up one or more international peace camps between the opposing armed forces. Our object will be to withstand nonviolently any armed aggression by any party to the present Gulf dispute.” However, on January 27, 1991, the peace camp was closed by Iraq because the authorities had “decided that the continued presence of the camp was a security risk.”

Likewise, a January 2022 proposal of the Association of World Citizens, “Ukraine-Donbass-Russian Frontier: Is a Nongovernmental Interposition Peace Team a Possibility?“, was followed three weeks later by the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Thus, the creation of interposition peace teams in the Israel-Palestine conflict would not be easy to create for political and logistic reasons. There are economic and logistic resources required and, more importantly, there is the need to raise enough volunteers who are mature, culturally sensitive, and analytically minded to achieve a critical mass that would make a difference in the decision-making of the conflicting parties. There is also the need to keep the unity of purpose within the teams if they have not worked together before. However, the current situation is very dangerous. The dangers are widely recognized. Therefore, all forms of conflict reduction need to be explored.

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

Torture in Wartime: Growing Awareness—a Human Rights Council Focus

In Being a World Citizen, Conflict Resolution, Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, International Justice, NGOs, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, Track II, United Nations, War Crimes, Women's Rights, World Law on December 19, 2023 at 12:19 PM

The Association of World Citizens (AWC) first raised the issue of the use of sexual torture in time of violent conflicts in the United Nations (UN) Commission on Human Rights in March 2001, citing the judgement of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, which maintained that there can be no time limitations on bringing the accused to trial.

The AWC presentation highlighted sexual violence in the conflicts in what is today the Democratic Republic of Congo, formerly Zaire. Conflict related sexual violence refers to rape, sexual slavery, forced prostitution, forced abortion and other ways to humiliate. To the best of my knowledge, no person in Zaire/DRC was tried. Awareness building and enforcement measures develop slowly.

The UN Human Rights Council, the current incarnation of what was once the Commission on Human Rights, has developed a pattern of having Special Rapporteurs on specific topics or countries. The Special Rapporteur is not a UN or a national civil servant and is not paid, though work-related expenses are covered and UN Secretariat help is given. This independence, it is hoped, gives greater freedom to speak out. There has been a Special Rapporteur on Torture nearly from the start of Special Rapporteurs.

The current Special Rapporteur on Torture is Prof. Alice Jill Edwards, originally from Australia and now an academic research fellow in Geneva. She has worked in the past both for the UN and for Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs). She has worked with rape victims in Bosnia-Herzegovina and has long argued that rape should qualify as a form of torture.

Prof. Alice Jill Edwards

She was recently in Ukraine, a first mission in time of war. As she said,

“We are living in an era of war, and we have lost the art of mediation, compromise and acceptance of each other.”

While her findings have not yet been presented, she gave an overview of persons met and situations faced. She was concerned with the use of torture both by Russian military and by Ukrainian military and police. From her interviews in Ukraine, she holds that it is Russian state policy to use torture for military ends – whether to obtain intelligence, to humiliate and debase the enemy, and to keep the community in a state of fear.

The Ukrainian military and police are also willing to use torture on Russian prisoners of war as well as on alleged collaborators – Ukrainians who would have helped the Russian forces in different ways or who had administered areas that came under Russian control.

There are also NGO representatives who are collecting information, but many victims of torture have been traumatized and recalling accurately specific events is often difficult.

It is difficult to know what the state of justice will be once the armed conflict ends. In many cases, there is a reluctance to bring perpetrators to trial in order not to “open fresh wounds”. It is a vital issue that we must follow closely.

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

Nobel Peace Prize honors “Woman, Life, Liberty” and human rights endeavors

In Being a World Citizen, Current Events, Democracy, Human Rights, Middle East & North Africa, Solidarity, United Nations, Women's Rights, World Law on December 13, 2023 at 12:40 PM

By René Wadlow

On the traditional date of December 10, the Nobel Prize for Peace was awarded to the Iranian woman human rights activist Narges Mohammadi. She is in Evin Prison in Iran, called by some “The University of Evin” for the large number of intellectuals held there. Thus, the award was received by her twin children Ali and Kiana who live in exile in Paris with their father Taghi Rahmani, also a human rights activist.

Narges Mohammadi was put in prison for her human rights writings in 2016 and liberated in 2020, only to be put back in prison in November 2021 where living conditions are very difficult and her health has weakened.

In honoring Narges Mohammadi, the Nobel Committee was honoring the many women (and some men) who have taken to the streets and the school yards to protest the death at the hands of the “morality police” of Mahsa Amini with the battle cry of “Woman, Life, Liberty.”

Source: CBS News

The protests began on September 3, 2022 at the announcement of the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini in police custody, having been arrested by the “morality police” for having some of her hair beyond the hijab (veil). She was an ethnic Kurd. The protests began in the Kurdish areas but soon spread to all ethnic groups and to many parts of the country.

Women have been a central focus of the social policy of the Iranian Islamic government. Even before coming to power in 1979, Ayatollah Khomeini from his exile in France had said that the overly great liberty of women was a chief obstacle to his policies. Repressive policies against women with compulsory veiling laws were quickly put into place once in power.

Unlike what happened in Afghanistan because of the Taliban, women have not been barred from higher education. It is estimated that some 65 per cent of university students are women. Many women play important roles within society but must keep a low profile, dress according to the dress code, and be under the control of a man at least when visible in public.

However, things are changing. Increasingly, the symbolic themes of the protests are shifting from a focus on the restrictions on women to the nature of the clerical regime itself. The conservative president Ebrahim Raissi is called into question. As Narges Mohammadi has said, “Can you hear the first sounds of the walls which are cracking? Soon you will hear the walls falling into dust by the strength and determination of the Iranians.”

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

Human Rights Day: A Time for Celebration – and, More Than Ever, for Action

In Being a World Citizen, Human Rights, NGOs, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, Track II, United Nations, World Law on December 10, 2023 at 7:23 PM

By René Wadlow

In this time when there are violent conflicts and real dangers, it is vital to come together to champion positive values and plan for common actions on this December 10: Human Rights Day.

Citizens of the World believe that building respect for human rights will help to ensure the dignity to which every individual is entitled. We are dedicated to the development of a global ethic and a consciousness of humanity as one community. Thus, we develop a deep awareness of the oneness of life.

It was in the ruins caused by the Second World War (1939-1945) that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights began to be written. The Declaration was presented to the world on December 10, 1948 from Paris, France where the United Nations (UN) General Assembly was meeting that year. In the first years of its existence, the General Assembly met in different cities until the UN had a permanent headquarters in New York.

The principle aim of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was to create a framework for a world society that was in need of universal codes based on mutual consent in order to function. The early years of the UN were characterized by the division between the Western and the Communist conceptions of human rights. Neither side called into question the concept of universality. The debate centered on which rights – political, economic, and social – were to be included in the Universal Declaration.

It was Eleanor Roosevelt who helped to craft the Universal Declaration. She was appointed the United States (U.S.) representative to the UN Commission on Human Rights and was then chosen as its chairperson. Mrs. Roosevelt’s work as chairperson was critical in integrating the world’s ideologies into a truly universal conception of human rights. There were strong-minded representatives as key members of the Commission which wrote the Declaration: Dr. Peng-Chun Chang of China, Dr. Charles Malik of Lebanon, Professor René Cassin of France, Dr. John Humphrey of Canada, Dr. Alexander Bogonolov of the Soviet Union. Mrs. Roosevelt helped to bring together into one document the political and civil rights that are the core of the Western liberal tradition with the economic, social, and cultural rights that had been at the fore of the struggles for social justice in the 1920s and 1930s.

Eleanor Roosevelt holding the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Today, human rights have become one of the pillars of the world society. People, no matter where they live, increasingly demand respect for their human rights. They judge the institutions of government by how well these institutions respond to a comprehensive vision of human rights. Food, shelter, employment, education, and access for health care go hand in hand with demands for equitable and effective justice, the right to participate in government, to express one’s thoughts freely, and to live by one’s own moral and spiritual convictions.

We know that there are many obstacles to the full enjoyment of human rights. However, on this UN Human Rights Day we rededicate ourselves to creative action. We know that humanity is advancing toward the full development of the person and that human rights serves as a strong goal.

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

Gaza Hostilities Renewed: New Mediation Efforts Needed

In Being a World Citizen, Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, Middle East & North Africa, NGOs, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, Track II, United Nations on December 3, 2023 at 12:43 PM

By René Wadlow

On Friday, December 1, 2023, with Hamas firing rockets into Tel Aviv and Israeli forces renewing airstrikes on the Gaza Strip, the “humanitarian pause” in the Gaza fighting came to an end.

Martin Griffiths, head of the United Nations (UN) Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, said, “Over the past seven days, hostages were released, families were reunited, and more patients received some medical care. The volume of aid into and across Gaza increased… Now, in a matter of hours, scores were reportedly killed and injured. Families were told to evacuate again. Hopes were dashed. Almost two months into the fighting, the children, women, and men of Gaza are all terrified. They have nowhere safe to go and very little to survive on. They live surrounded by disease, destruction and death. This is unacceptable… We need the fighting to stop.”

Thus, we see the need for increased mediation among groups and governments to maintain international humanitarian law and human rights standards. The taking of hostages is a violation of international humanitarian law. Therefore, the International Committee of the Red Cross which is the chief organization to maintain international humanitarian law was directly involved in the release of the hostages. Many of the Palestinian persons in Israeli prisons have not had fair trials – in some cases no trials at all only administrative detention – in violation of international human rights provisions.

There is a need for more go-betweens, third-party mediators who can help to overcome barriers and to start negotiations. Mediation is an effort to change perceptions of both the nature of the conflict and the nature of the enemy. There is a need to lessen misconceptions and exaggerated fears. Small realistic steps must be taken on the long road to stable peace.

Currently, there are real dangers that the violence will increase on the frontier with Lebanon and in the West Bank area between Israeli settlers and Palestinians. An increasing number of people are being displaced, adding to the vast number of people uprooted in the Gaza Strip.

The pain and suffering already undergone should be an increased motivation for strong efforts for peace and justice. The negotiations which led to the “pauses” and the exchanges were largely carried out by the representatives of a few governments, Qatar, Egypt, and the USA. There is a potential role for nongovernmental efforts. We must cooperate on such possibilities by exchanging information and possible contacts. There may be ways of increasing the nongovernmental efforts of mediation through “pilot projects”. The times require strong and coordinated efforts.

Prof. Rene Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

Women as Peacebuilders

In Being a World Citizen, Conflict Resolution, Human Rights, NGOs, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, Track II, United Nations, Women's Rights on October 31, 2023 at 8:00 AM

By René Wadlow

October 31 is the anniversary of the United Nations (UN) Security Council Resolution 1325 which calls for “the full and equal participation of women in conflict prevention, peace processes, and peacebuilding, thus creating opportunities for women to become fully involved in governance and leadership.” This historic Security Council Resolution 1325 of October 31, 2000 provides a mandate to incorporate gender perspectives in all areas of peace support.

Since 2000, there have been no radical changes in UN or governmental practices as a result of Resolution 1325, but the goal has been articulated and accepted.

As UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres wrote in his 2023 Report on Women, Peace, and Security, “Despite our best efforts, women represented just sixteen percent of negotiators or delegates in the peace processes led, or co-led, by the United Nations.” Women were almost completely missing from peace processes in situations monitored by the UN Security Council such as Ethiopia, Sudan, Libya, and Myanmar.

There has been a growing awareness that women are not just victims in violent armed conflicts and wars – “collateral damage” – but are chosen targets. Recent conflicts have served to bring rape and other sexual atrocities as deliberate tools of war to the forefront of international attention. Such violations must be properly documented; the perpetrators brought to justice; and victims provided with redress.

However, women should not only be seen as victims of war. They are often significantly involved in taking initiatives to promote peace. Some writers have stressed the essential link between women, motherhood, and nonviolence, arguing that those in mothering work have distinct motives for rejecting war which run in tandem with their ability to resolve conflicts nonviolently. Others reject this position of a gender bias toward peace and stress rather that the same continuum of nonviolence to violence is found among women as among men.

In practice, it is never all women nor all men who are involved in peacemaking efforts. Sometimes, it is only a few persons, especially at the start of peacemaking efforts. The basic question is how best to use the talents, energies, and networks of both women and men for efforts at conflict resolution.

October 31 can serve as a day of rededication to inclusive processes for peacebuilding.

Prof. René Wadlow is the Association of World Citizens.

Exodus to Sinai: For Gaza’s Palestinians, No Promised Land in Sight

In Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, Middle East & North Africa, NGOs, Refugees, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, Track II, United Nations, World Law on October 16, 2023 at 11:18 AM

By René Wadlow

Calls from both governments and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) for a ceasefire in the Hamas-Israel armed conflict having not been acted upon. Attention is now centered on a potential Israeli military land invasion of the Gaza Strip. Attacks from the air have already been very destructive of civilian institutions. Many persons have had their homes destroyed and have taken shelter in schools and other public buildings. There are signs that the situation will grow more violent. There are no negotiations in sight.

Thus, many people living in Gaza would want to leave and find safety. Passage to Israel is impossible; the frontier is now blocked, and the Israeli government considers all those living in Gaza as potential enemies. Thus, the only frontier post open is that of Rafah, leading to the Egyptian territory of Sinai. However, for the moment, the Egyptian government, fearing a mass exodus, refuses to open the Rafah post to a large number of people.

Some Palestinians fear that if there is a mass migration to Sinai, that would be a form of “ethnic cleansing” of Gaza. The population would then be replaced by Israelis. On a more positive note, potentially, the Rafah crossing could be used to bring in humanitarian supplies for Gaza collected in Egypt and elsewhere.

At this point, there should be governmental and NGO appeals to the Egyptian government to open the Rafah post to a large number of people. Facilities to meet the needs of refugees should be prepared. It is unlikely that people will spend 40 years in Sinai waiting to enter the promised land. However, current security is vital, and negotiations for longer-range conflict settlements need to start.

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

Upholding International Humanitarian Law in Times of Armed Conflict: A World Citizen Appeal for the Middle East

In Being a World Citizen, Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, International Justice, Middle East & North Africa, NGOs, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, Track II, United Nations, War Crimes, World Law on October 12, 2023 at 7:08 PM

By René Wadlow

The Association of World Citizens (AWC), devoted to the resolution of armed conflicts through negotiations in good faith, is deeply concerned with the October 7 outbreak of violence between Hamas and Israel and the possible extension of the conflict to Hezbollah and Lebanon. The AWC stresses the need in the world society for systems of world law such as those standards expressed in International Humanitarian Law. Thus, we call for resolute action on the violations of humanitarian law in the Hamas-Israel conflict with the indiscriminate killing of civilians, the holding of hostages, and the destruction of medical and educational infrastructure.

Regular military personnel of all countries are theoretically informed of the rules of the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, and the Protocol Additional adopted in 1977.

When the 1949 Geneva Conventions were drafted and adopted, it was possible to spell out in considerable detail rules regarding prisoners of war and the protection of civilians, in particular Common Article 3 (so called because it is found in all four Conventions) provides that “each Party to the conflict shall be bound to apply, as a minimum, the following provisions: Persons taking no active part in the hostilities…shall in all circumstances be treated humanely without any adverse distinction founded on race, color, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria.”

(C) The Guardian (UK)

The importance of Common Article 3 should not be underestimated. It sets out in straightforward terms important protections that all parties to a conflict must respect. In order to meet the need for additional protection, international humanitarian law has evolved to cover not only international armed conflict but also internal armed conflict. Today, international human rights standards are also considered part of international humanitarian law, thus providing additional protection for vulnerable population groups such as women, children, and minorities.

As situations of internal violence and strife proliferate, abuses committed by non-State actors, such as armed militias, are increasing concerns. Fundamental standards of international humanitarian law are intended to ensure the effective protection of human beings in all situations. The standards are clear. (1)

There are two major weaknesses in the effectiveness of international humanitarian law. The first is that many people do not know that it exists and that they are bound by its norms. Thus, there is an important role for greater promotional activities, the dissemination of information through general education, specific training of the military, outreach to armed militias, and cooperation with a wide range of nongovernmental organizations.

The second weakness is that violations of international humanitarian law are rarely punished. Governments too often tolerate these violations. Few soldiers are tried, or courtmartialed, for the violations of international humanitarian law. This weakness is even more true of nongovernmental militias and armed groups.

(C) World Health Organization

In fact, most violations of international humanitarian law are not actions of individual soldiers or militia members carried away by a sudden rush of anger, fear, a desire of revenge or a sudden sexual urge to rape a woman. Soldiers and militia members violating the norms of international humanitarian law are acting on orders of their commanders.

Thus, the only sold response is an act of conscience to refuse an order of a military or militia higher up and refuse to torture, to bomb a medical facility, to shoot a prisoner, to harm a child, and to rape a woman. Conscience, that inner voice which discerns what is right from wrong and encourages right action is the value on which we can build the defense of international humanitarian law. The defense of conscience to refuse unjust orders is a large task but a crucial action for moving toward a law-based world society.

Notes

(1) For useful guides to international humanitarian law see:

D. Schindler and J. Toman, The Laws of Armed Conflicts (Martinus Nihjoff Publishers, 1988)

H. McCoubrey and N.D. White, International Law and Armed Conflicts (Dartmouth Publishing Co., 1992)

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

Déclaration de l’AWC sur les violences au Moyen-Orient

In Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, Middle East & North Africa, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, Track II, United Nations, War Crimes, World Law on October 8, 2023 at 5:32 PM

LES CITOYENS DU MONDE APPELLENT A UNE FIN IMMEDIATE

DES HOSTILITES ENTRE ISRAEL ET LE HAMAS

ET A UN EFFORT VERITABLE DE CONSTRUCTION DE LA PAIX

POUR LE MOYEN-ORIENT

L’AWC, Organisation Non-Gouvernementale dotée du Statut Consultatif auprès de l’ONU et active à ce titre au sein du Conseil des Droits de l’Homme, est profondément alarmée de la dernière flambée de violence entre les milices armées du Mouvement de la Résistance islamique palestinien (Hamas) et les Forces de Défense israéliennes (Tsahal). Plus encore, nous sommes consternés des conséquences des attaques délibérées, perpétrées par les deux côtés, contre les droits des civils en Israël et dans la Bande de Gaza.

Depuis les attaques lancées par ses forces au petit matin du 7 octobre, le Hamas prend pour cible des civils en Israël, étant allé jusqu’à capturer des citoyens israéliens, tant civils que soldats de Tsahal, pour les garder en otage. La cause légitime d’un peuple privé de longue date de sa propre terre, cause que même l’ONU reconnaît comme légitime sur le plan international, ne saurait être servie dans la dignité par de telles méthodes qui s’inscrivent en faux contre le droit international.

Le gouvernement actuel d’Israël n’a fait que repousser les limites du mépris pour ce même droit international, à travers des déclarations et mesures répétées et insistantes visant à la discrimination systématique contre le peuple palestinien dans les Territoires palestiniens occupés (TPO). A l’intérieur même des frontières internationalement reconnues d’Israël, le gouvernement israélien actuel a également semé les graines de la discorde et de l’affrontement politique en tentant d’amoindrir les prérogatives du pouvoir judiciaire et, ce faisant, de mettre fin à la tradition de démocratie épaulée de contrepouvoirs qui est celle d’Israël.

Cette conduite mal inspirée s’avère nuisible tant au peuple palestinien qu’aux citoyens d’Israël. Elle crée à présent un chaos nouveau dans la région qui revient, selon les termes du Chapitre VII de la Charte des Nations Unies, à une menace contre la paix et la sécurité internationales. La situation risque de s’aggraver encore maintenant que le Hezbollah, notoirement soutenu par l’Iran, vient en dépit de toute sagesse de rejoindre le combat depuis le sud du Liban.

Une fois de plus, les droits des civils en Israël et dans la Bande de Gaza sont réduits à l’état de victimes de la haine et de la violence qu’ont déchaîné les deux côtés en l’absence d’un effort international, faisant cruellement défaut mais se voyant constamment refusé, pour résoudre le conflit du Moyen-Orient en s’attaquant à ses causes premières mêmes, au nombre desquelles l’exigence de justice qui est celle du peuple palestinien et le besoin de sécurité qui est celui de l’Etat d’Israël.

En conséquence, l’AWC réitère son appel à la fin immédiate des hostilités en Israël et dans la Bande de Gaza. Nous appelons également à la libération de toute personne, qu’il s’agisse d’un civil ou d’un militaire, prise en otage par le Hamas.

Nous en appelons de surcroît à la communauté internationale pour enfin entreprendre un effort authentique de construction de la paix en Israël et dans les TPO, ce en prenant pleinement en compte les causes premières du conflit et en faisant droit comme il convient à la légitime revendication du peuple palestinien pour la justice ainsi qu’à la revendication tout aussi légitime du peuple israélien pour la sécurité.

Il n’existe aujourd’hui plus aucun autre choix.

AWC Statement on Violence in the Middle East

In Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, Middle East & North Africa, NGOs, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, Track II, United Nations, War Crimes, World Law on October 8, 2023 at 5:32 PM

WORLD CITIZENS CALL FOR AN IMMEDIATE END

TO HOSTILITIES BETWEEN ISRAEL AND HAMAS

AND FOR A GENUINE PEACEBUILDING EFFORT IN THE MIDDLE EAST

The AWC, a Nongovernmental Organization in Consultative Status with the United Nations (UN) and accredited with the UN Human Rights Council, is deeply alarmed at the latest flare of violence between the armed militias of the Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) and the Israeli Defense Force (IDF). Most importantly, we are appalled at the consequences of the deliberate attacks from both sides on the rights of civilians in Israel and the Gaza Strip.

Since the attacks launched by its forces in the early morning of October 7, Hamas has been targeting civilians in Israel, even capturing Israeli citizens, both civilians and IDF soldiers, to keep them as hostages. The legitimate cause of a people long deprived of their own land, a cause that even the UN recognizes as internationally legitimate, cannot be served in dignity by such methods that run counter to international law.

The current government of Israel has been constantly pushing the limits of disregard for the same international law, through repeated and insistent statements and practices aiming at systematic discrimination against the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). Within the internationally recognized borders of the State of Israel, the current Israeli Government has also sowed the seeds of discord and political strife by trying to lessen the powers of the judicial branch and, in so doing, to end Israel’s tradition of democracy with checks and balances.

This misguided conduct has proved harmful to both the Palestinian people and the citizenry of Israel. It is now creating new chaos in the region amounting to, in the very words of Chapter VII of the UN Charter, a threat to international peace and security. The situation could get even worse as Hezbollah, notoriously backed by Iran, has now unwisely joined the fight from South Lebanon.

Once more, the rights of civilians in Israel and the Gaza Strip are falling victim to the hatred and violence unleashed by both sides in the absence of a badly needed but constantly denied international effort to tackle the Middle East conflict right from its root causes, including the Palestinian people’s demand for justice and the State of Israel’s need for security.

Consequently, the AWC reiterates its call for an immediate end to hostilities in Israel and the Gaza Strip. We also call for the release of every person, civilian or military, taken hostage by Hamas.

We further urge the international community to finally undertake a genuine peacebuilding effort in Israel and the OPT by addressing the root causes of the conflict and duly acting on the legitimate claim of the Palestinian people for justice and the equally legitimate claim of the Israeli people for security.

There is truly no other option now.