The Official Blog of the

Rwanda Genocide: The Lasting Consequences of Armed Violence

In Africa, Being a World Citizen, Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Fighting Racism, Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, International Justice, Refugees, Solidarity, The Search for Peace, United Nations, War Crimes, World Law on April 12, 2024 at 6:00 AM

By René Wadlow

On April 7, 2024, Paul Kagame, President of Rwanda, lit the memorial flame of the monument to the victims of the 1994 genocide during which some 800,000 persons, mostly ethnic Tutsi, were killed. In 1994, Paul Kagame was the head of a Tutsi-led militia, the Rwanda Patriotic Front, which put an end to the massacres in Rwanda. Many of the Hutu-led governmental forces of 1994 fled to what is today the Democratic Republic of Congo, where there were already established Hutu communities. Ethnic-tribal frontiers do not follow the same frontiers as those created by the colonial powers.

During the colonial period and also since independence, when speaking of Rwandan politics, politics was described as a struggle between Tutsi and Hutu. However, the conflictual cleavages were more complicated. There were a good number of “mixed marriages” between Tutsi and Hutu. Nevertheless, in times of tension, political leaders played upon the Hutu-Tutsi divide.

In 1994, as soon as Kagame’s forces took control of the capital, Kigali, he declared himself president and has held power since. His emphasis has been on economic stability, the development of tourism and the creation of an effective civil service. Because of the 1994 genocide, Rwanda has received a good deal of foreign aid and support. However, some 70 percent of the population are still in the rural areas and farm small plots of land.

A symbolic tombstone in memory of the Tutsi victims of the Rwandan genocide at the Père Lachaise cemetery in Paris, France (C) Pierre-Yves Beaudouin / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0

The entry of Hutu militias into the Democratic Republic of Congo when defeated in Rwanda added to an already complicated situation in the administrative provinces of North and South Kivu. In mid-1994, more than one million Rwandan Hutu refugees poured into the Kivus. Many of these Hutu were still armed; among them were the “génocidaires” who, a couple of months earlier, were killing Tutsi and moderate Hutu. The “génocidaires” continued to kill Tutsi living in the Congo, many of whom had migrated there in the eighteenth century.

The people in eastern Congo have lived together for several centuries and had developed techniques of conflict resolution especially between the two chief agricultural lifestyles – that of agriculture and that of cattle herding. The Hutu were farmers and the Tutsi cattle raisers. However, a desire of others to control the wealth of the area – rich in gold, tin, and tropical timber – overburdened the local techniques of conflict resolution and opened the door to new negative forces interested only in making money and gaining political power. The inability to deal with land tenure and land use issues, the lack of social services and socio-economic development created the conditions which led to multiple forms of violence.

Land tenure issues have always been complex. Land is often thought of as belonging to the ethnic community and is given to clans or to individuals for their use, sometimes for a given period, sometimes for several lifetimes if the land is cultivated. The rules of land tenure often differ from one ethnic group to another even a small distance apart. Traditionally clan chiefs would be called upon to settle land disputes. However, with the large displacement of people, land disputes have become more frequent, and clan chiefs have often disappeared or lost their function as judges.

Into this disorder, in 1999, the United Nations (UN) sent peacekeepers but there was no peace to keep. The UN Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUSCO) was the largest of the UN peacekeeping forces, currently some 2,000 military, 180 police, and 400 civilian administrators.

Troops with the Ghanaian Battalion of MONUSCO marking their medal presentation day in Kinshasa on October 19, 2017 (C) MONUSCO Photos

The States which have provided the bulk of the UN forces in the Congo – India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nepal – have other worries and few cultural affinities. Thus, these States have made no large effort to call world attention to the eastern Congo and to the very difficult situation the soldiers face. UN troops are not trained to deal with complex cultural issues – especially land tenure and land use issues which are the chief causes of the conflicts.

Thus, there is a popular frustration at the ineffectiveness. The troops are popularly called “tourists” who only watch what is going on. Despite the UN troops, there have been large-scale occurrences of violation of human rights and humanitarian law by all the many parties in the conflict with massive displacement of population, plundering of villages, systematic rape of women, summary executions and the use of child soldiers. Thus, the newly elected President, Felix Tshisekedi, has asked the UN to remove all its troops by the end of 2024. Troops are currently being removed.

One of some 200 armed groups in eastern Congo, the M23, is said to be backed by Rwanda, although the Rwanda government denies this. Today, there is a security vacuum, and the military of the Democratic Republic of Congo will have difficulty to create stable socioeconomic structures. Thus, the 1994 genocide is a stark reminder that violence has long range consequences.

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

United Nations Human Rights Focus on Iran Continues

In Being a World Citizen, Current Events, Human Rights, Middle East & North Africa, NGOs, Solidarity, Track II, United Nations, World Law on April 6, 2024 at 6:00 AM

By René Wadlow

The United Nations (UN) Human Rights Council whose Spring session ended on April 5, 2024 voted on April 4 to continue the mandate of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Iran. The Mission is a three-person group, all women, chaired by Sara Hossain of Bangladesh. The Mission was created in 2022 in response to the death in police offices of Jina Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old woman of the Iranian-Kurdish community. The protests had begun in the Kurdish areas but quickly spread to many areas of the country and became known by their protest cry of “Woman, Life, Freedom”.

The Mission has collected material from many sources including reports and statements from Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) such as Amnesty International and the Association of World Citizens (AWC). The Mission is to continue for the year 2024 in order to complete and write up its findings.

The vote on the continuation of the Mission is a reflection of the political divisions of the 47-member Human Rights Council. 24 States voted for the continuation, 8 against and 15 abstained. Those States voting against were the Asian countries: China, Vietnam, Indonesia, the African: Algeria, Sudan, Burundi, Eritrea, and Cuba for Latin America. Abstaining were the Asian States: Bangladesh, India, Malaysia, Maldives, the African States: Cameroon, Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, South Africa, the Arab States: Kuwait, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, and the Central Asian: Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.

In addition to the vote on the continuation of the Fact-Finding Mission, there was a positive vote also on April 4 to continue the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran who is since July 2018 Mr. Javaid Rehman, Professor of Law at Brunel University in London. The position of a Special Rapporteur of the Human Rights Council, usually devoted to a specific country or to a topic such as food, education, or housing, has taken on a real importance. The Special Rapporteur, usually an academic who has had earlier contact with the UN human rights efforts, is not a member of the UN Secretariat and is not paid – the idea being that this increases his independence. His expenses are covered on the days on which he is working on his topic, and he has secretarial and clerical help from the UN Secretariat.

Each year Professor Rehman regrets that the Iranian government refuses his entry into the country, but like the Fact-Finding Mission, he carries out a large number of interviews with Iranians in exile, scholars, and the representatives of NGOs. He usually covers the same issues and makes recommendations. It is impossible to know how the recommendations are discussed by the Iranian authorities. However, in practice, there are few signs of progress.

(C) Taymaz Valley

Topics regularly analyzed are the use of the death penalty, arbitrary arrest, use of torture and degrading treatment, freedom of opinion and expression, arrests of human rights defenders and lawyers, sexual violence, discrimination against members of the Baha’i faith and other religious minorities, discrimination against ethnic minorities and the position of women and children. The analysis is followed by recommendations for meeting UN human rights standards. All on 42 pages this year.

The reports of the Special Rapporteurs are part of a process of awareness building. There are seldom obvious victories, but a central task of our time is to evolve a world order based on principles of peace and justice. A useful analysis of the role of Special Rapporteurs is a book by Alfred de Zayas, Building A Just World Order. (1) De Zayas had been for 16 years a member of the UN human rights Secretariat. On retirement, he became an academic in Geneva. For six years he was the Human Rights Council Independent Expert on the Promotion of a Democratic and Equitable International Order (2012-2018). We knew each other well when I was an NGO representative at the UN in Geneva and often worked on human rights issues.

Professor Rehman’s analysis of Iran is a good overview and serves as an agenda for NGO action.

Note

(1) Alfred de Zayas, Building A Just World Order (Atlanta, GA: Clarity Press, 2021, 466 pp.)

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.

Needed Action Against World Hunger: The Consequences of Armed Conflict

In Africa, Being a World Citizen, Conflict Resolution, Current Events, Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, Middle East & North Africa, Solidarity, Sudan, The Search for Peace, United Nations, World Law on April 2, 2024 at 6:00 AM

By René Wadlow

The United Nations (UN) has recently drawn attention to situations of acute hunger in areas where there is armed conflict. Stephane Dujarric, the UN Spokesperson, stated that, in Sudan, there were 18 million people facing acute food insecurity with alarming reports of child deaths related to malnutrition. Sudan has been the victim of a year-long armed conflict between the leaders of the regular army and its rival, the Rapid Support Force. This conflict has been particularly acute in the Darfur Province which has been the scene of violence and massive displacement of population since 2004.

In Ethiopia, where there has been fighting, especially in the Tigray Province between the forces of the government and Tigray militias, there is widespread hunger. Many people have been displaced by the fighting, and thus food crops have not been planted. International relief efforts have been hindered by the disorganization of all governmental services and corruption. The hunger situation is also acute in Gezira Province, usually a “breadbasket” area of food crops.

The situation in the Gaza Strip has been front page news since October 8, 2023, when the bombing of the Strip began in the armed conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. The delivery of food aid has been a central issue of international concern. However, hunger persists and its consequences deepen. The economic and social infrastructure of the Gaza Strip has been largely destroyed and will take a long time to rebuild even when, and if, a political administration is reestablished. Beth Bechdol, Associate Director of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has said that the speed and degree of the food crisis in the Gaza Strip is unprecedented.

These examples, to which others could be added such as the eastern zones of the Democratic Republic of Congo, are an indication of the need to combine conflict resolution efforts with food support and other forms of relief. As long as violence continues, relief can only be uneven and temporary. Too often, as within the UN system, conflict resolution efforts and food relief are separated and not sufficiently coordinated. A holistic vision is necessary and combined efforts undertaken.

A Palestinian woman and her child facing starvation in northern Gaza (C) Libertinus

Prof. René Wadlow is President of the Association of World Citizens.